High-Efficacy Therapy Discontinuation vs Continuation in Patients 50 Years and Older With Nonactive MS.

Importance: A recent randomized clinical trial concluded that discontinuing medium-efficacy therapy might be a reasonable option for older patients with nonactive multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is a lack of data on discontinuing high-efficacy therapy (HET). In younger patients, the discontinuation of natalizumab and fingolimod is associated with a risk of rebound of disease activity. Objective: To determine whether discontinuing HET in patients 50 years and older with nonactive MS is associated with an increased risk of relapse compared with continuing HET. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study used data from 38 referral centers from the French MS registry (Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques [OFSEP] database). Among 84704 patients in the database, data were extracted for 1857 patients 50 years and older with relapsing-remitting MS treated by HET and with no relapse or magnetic resonance imaging activity for at least 2 years. After verification of the medical records, 1620 patients were classified as having discontinued HET or having remained taking treatment and were matched 1:1 using a dynamic propensity score (including age, sex, disease phenotype, disability, treatment of interest, and time since last inflammatory activity). Patients were included from February 2008 to November 2021, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 5.1 (2.9) years. Data were extracted in June 2022. Exposures: Natalizumab, fingolimod, rituximab, and ocrelizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to first relapse. Results: Of 1620 included patients, 1175 (72.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 54.7 (4.8) years. Among the 1452 in the HET continuation group and 168 in the HET discontinuation group, 154 patients in each group were matched using propensity scores (mean [SD] age, 57.7 [5.5] years; mean [SD] delay since the last inflammatory activity, 5.6 [3.8] years; mean [SD] follow-up duration after propensity score matching, 2.5 [2.1] years). Time to first relapse was significantly reduced in the HET discontinuation group compared with the HET continuation group (hazard ratio, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.0-8.5; P < .001) but differed between HETs, with a hazard ratio of 7.2 (95% CI, 2.1-24.5; P = .001) for natalizumab, 4.5 (95% CI, 1.3-15.5; P = .02) for fingolimod, and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.3-4.8; P = .85) for anti-CD20 therapy. Conclusion and Relevance: As in younger patients, in patients 50 years and older with nonactive MS, the risk of relapse increased significantly after stopping HETs that impact immune cell trafficking (natalizumab and fingolimod). There was no significant increase in risk after stopping HETs that deplete B-cells (anti-CD20 therapy). This result may inform decisions about stopping HETs in clinical practice.

Efficacy of dalfampridine in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A pilot study.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of dalfampridine in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Methods: We included 15 consecutive patients, who were started on a treatment of dalfampridine 10 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Efficacy assessment was based on walking ability improvement using Timed-25-Foot Walk and 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale tests. Results: The mean Timed-25-Foot Walk score was reduced from 14.8 (±2.4) to 11.3 (±1.9) seconds (p = 0.01). The mean score on the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale was reduced from 41.2 (±3.5) to 31.4 (±3.2) (p = 0.004). Conclusion: Dalfampridine seems to be useful for symptomatic treatment of walking impairment in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Cancer and multiple sclerosis: 2023 recommendations from the French Multiple Sclerosis Society.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data reveal that 45% of persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in France are more than 50 years. This population more than 50 is more susceptible to cancer, and this risk may be increased by frequent use of immunosuppressive drugs. Consequently, concerns have arisen about the potential increased risk of cancer in PwMS and how patients should be screened and managed in terms of cancer risk. OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based recommendations to manage the coexistence of cancer and multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: The French Group for Recommendations in MS collected articles from PubMed and university databases covering the period January 1975 through June 2022. The RAND/UCLA method was employed to achieve formal consensus. MS experts comprehensively reviewed the full-text articles and developed the initial recommendations. A group of multidisciplinary health care specialists then validated the final proposal. RESULTS: Five key questions were addressed, encompassing various topics such as cancer screening before or after initiating a disease-modifying therapy (DMT), appropriate management of MS in the context of cancer, recommended follow-up for cancer in patients receiving a DMT, and the potential reintroduction of a DMT after initial cancer treatment. A strong consensus was reached for all 31 recommendations. CONCLUSION: These recommendations propose a strategic approach to managing cancer risk in PwMS.

Serum Biomarker Profiles Discriminate AQP4 Seropositive and Double Seronegative Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) serum levels are useful to define disease activity in different neurologic conditions. These biomarkers are increased in patients with aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD (AQP4+NMOSD) during clinical attacks suggesting a concomitant axonal and glial damage. However, there are contradictory results in double seronegative NMOSD (DS-NMOSD). The aim of this study was to characterize the neuronal, axonal, and glial damage of DS-NMOSD in comparison with AQP4+NMOSD. METHODS: Patients with DS-NMOSD (i.e., for AQP4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies-MOG-Abs) and age-matched AQP4+NMOSD diagnosed according to the latest diagnostic criteria and with available serum samples obtained within 3 months from onset/relapse were retrospectively enrolled from 14 international centers. Clinical and radiologic data were collected. Serum NfL, GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1 levels were determined using an ultrasensitive paramagnetic bead-based ELISA (SIMOA). Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: We included 25 patients with AQP4+NMOSD and 26 with DS-NMOSD. The median age at disease onset (p = 0.611) and female sex predominance (p = 0.072) were similar in the 2 groups. The most common syndromes at sampling in both AQP4+NMOSD and DS-NMOSD were myelitis (56% vs 38.5%) and optic neuritis (34.6% vs 32%), with no statistical differences (p = 0.716). Median EDSS at sampling was 3.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-7.7) in the AQP4+NMOSD group and 4 (IQR [3-6]) in the DS-NMOSD group (p = 0.974). Serum GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1 levels were higher in patients with AQP4+NMOSD compared with those with DS-NMOSD (median 308.3 vs 103.4 pg/mL p = 0.001; median 1.2 vs 0.5 pg/mL, p = 0.001; and median 61.4 vs 35 pg/mL, p = 0.006, respectively). The ROC curve analysis showed that GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1, but not NfL, values were able to discriminate between AQP4+ and DS-NMOSD (area under the curve (AUC) tau: 0.782, p = 0.001, AUC GFAP: 0.762, p = 0.001, AUC UCH-L1: 0.723, p = 0.006). NfL levels were associated with EDSS at nadir only in patients with AQP4+NMOSD. DISCUSSION: Serum GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1 levels discriminate between AQP4+NMOSD and DS-NMOSD. The different biomarker profile of AQP4+NMOSD vs DS-NMOSD suggests heterogeneity of diseases within the latter category and provides useful data to improve our understanding of this disease.

Immunotherapies Targeting Amyloid and Tau Protein in Alzheimer's Disease: Should We Move Away from Diseases and Focus on Biological Targets? A Systematic Review and Expert Opinion.

INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia worldwide, making it a major public health issue. Anti-amyloid and anti-tau antibodies are the most advanced therapeutic approach at present. Three drugs (lecanemab, donanemab and aducanumab) are on track to be marketed in the coming months. In this systematic review, we review all Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials conducted in this indication and the particularities of the molecules tested. METHODS: The PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched through February 2023 for Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials involving passive anti-amyloid or anti-tau immunotherapies with published results. This review has been compiled in compliance with the PRISMA checklists. RESULTS: Of the 165 studies found and after eliminating duplicates, 40 studies had their results published on PubMed and/or ClinicalTrials.gov. Eight anti-amyloid molecules and four anti-tau molecules were the subject of Phase 2 studies, seven anti-amyloids were the subject of Phase 3 trials, and two molecules were granted early marketing approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The results were compiled in summary tables showing the primary endpoints used, results, age of the study population and specific adverse events for these molecules. DISCUSSION: Passive immunotherapy in AD is largely dominated by anti-amyloid antibodies, which are more numerous and more advanced in the pipeline. Lecanemab, donanemab and aducanumab are distinguished by their relative efficacy in terms of cognitive and functional evaluation but also by a decrease in amyloid and tau proteins in the brain. These three molecules have in common that they bind to N-terminal ends of amyloid fibrils and plaques. The findings of their studies raise the question of which criteria to apply when choosing which patient will receive them when marketed, such as the apoliprotein E gene's fourth allele (APOE4) genetic status of patients. The large number of negative studies may also raise the question of the criteria for defining the disease and the possible interest in redefining it on biological grounds to offer a more personalized medicine to patients suffering from neurodegenerative diseases.

Early use of high efficacy therapies in pediatric forms of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A real-life observational study.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric forms of multiple sclerosis are more active than those in adults. Yet, the effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches is not well studied in this population. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of the early use of high efficacy therapies (HETs) with the effectiveness of moderate efficacy therapies (METs) in children with MS. METHODS: This observational study included patients diagnosed with pediatric MS, at 4 hospital centers in France, during a 10-year period. METs included: interferon ß-1a, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide; HETs included: fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a new relapse, the secondary endpoint was EDSS worsening. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis (80% women; mean age 15.5 years, 81% treated with MET) with a median follow-up of 22.5 months. At baseline, 52 patients were on MET (interferon ß-1a, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide) and 12 patients were on HET (natalizumab, ocrelizumab). The cumulative probability of being relapse-free at 6.5 years was 23.3% on MET, vs 90.9% on HET (p = 0.013). The cumulative probability of no EDSS worsening did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients starting with METs had much higher clinical disease activity than those starting early with HETs. Rapid initiation of more aggressive treatment may allow better disease control; however, the data on EDSS worsening are not conclusive.

The biological sample collection of the OFSEP French MS registry: An essential tool dedicated to researchers.

Today's medicine strives to be personalized, preventive, predictive and participatory. This implies to have access to multimodal data to better characterize patients groups and to combine clinical and imaging data with high-quality biological samples. Collecting such data is one of the objectives of the Observatoire français de la sclérose en plaques (OFSEP), the French MS registry. On December 2022, the OFSEP biocollection includes 4,888 patients with scientific characteristics and about 90,000 samples. Thanks to its richness, this biocollection open for the scientific community, contributes to address unmet needs in MS through identification of multiomics determinants of MS activity, progression and secondary effects.

Rituximab De-escalation in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Exit strategies such as de-escalations have not been evaluated for rituximab in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). We hypothesized that they are associated with disease reactivations and aimed to estimate this risk. METHODS: We describe a case series of real-world de-escalations from the French NMOSD registry (NOMADMUS). All patients met the 2015 International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) diagnostic criteria for NMOSD. A computerized screening of the registry extracted patients with rituximab de-escalations and at least 12 months of subsequent follow-up. We searched for 7 de-escalation regimens: scheduled discontinuations or switches to an oral treatment after single infusion cycles, scheduled discontinuations or switches to an oral treatment after periodic infusions, de-escalations before pregnancies, de-escalations after tolerance issues, and increased infusion intervals. Rituximab discontinuations motivated by inefficacy or for unknown purposes were excluded. The primary outcome was the absolute risk of NMOSD reactivation (one or more relapses) at 12 months. AQP4+ and AQP4- serotypes were analyzed separately. RESULTS: We identified 137 rituximab de-escalations between 2006 and 2019 that corresponded to a predefined group: 13 discontinuations after a single infusion cycle, 6 switches to an oral treatment after a single infusion cycle, 9 discontinuations after periodic infusions, 5 switches to an oral treatment after periodic infusions, 4 de-escalations before pregnancies, 9 de-escalations after tolerance issues, and 91 increased infusion intervals. No group remained relapse-free over the whole de-escalation follow-up (mean: 3.2 years; range: 0.79-9.5), except pregnancies in AQP+ patients. In all groups combined and within 12 months, reactivations occurred after 11/119 de-escalations in patients with AQP4+ NMOSD (9.2%, 95% CI [4.7-15.9]), from 0.69 to 10.0 months, and in 5/18 de-escalations in patients with AQP4- NMOSD (27.8%, 95% CI [9.7-53.5]), from 1.1 to 9.9 months. DISCUSSION: There is a risk of NMOSD reactivation whatever the rituximab de-escalation regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02850705. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that de-escalation of rituximab increases the probability of disease reactivation.

Real-World Effectiveness of Natalizumab Extended Interval Dosing in a French Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Natalizumab, a therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Over the last several years, practitioners have used off-label extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab to reduce PML risk, despite the absence of a large-scale efficacy evaluation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study among adults with RRMS receiving stable standard interval dosing (SID), defined as a ≥ 12-month consecutive period of ≥ 11 natalizumab infusions/year in France. We compared the 12-month risk difference of remaining relapse-free (primary endpoint) between patients who switched to EID (≤ 9 natalizumab infusions) and those who remained on SID, with a noninferiority margin of - 11%. We used propensity score methods such as inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate, disease progression, and safety. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving EID (n = 147) and SID (n = 156). The proportion of relapse-free patients 12 months postbaseline was 142/147 in the EID (96.6%) and 144/156 in the SID group (92.3%); risk difference (95% CI) 4.3% (- 1.3 to 9.8%); p < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between relapse rates (0.043 vs. 0.083 per year, respectively; p = 0.14) or Expanded Disability Status Scale mean scores (2.43 vs. 2.72, respectively; p = 0.18); anti-JC virus index values were similar (p = 0.23); and no instances of PML were reported. The comparisons using IPTW (n = 306) and PSM (n = 204) were consistent. CONCLUSION: These results support the pertinence of using an EID strategy for RRMS patients treated with natalizumab. CLINICAL TRIALS: gov identifier (NCT04580381).

Time to steroids impacts visual outcome of optic neuritis in MOGAD.

BACKGROUND: To characterise the response to treatment of inaugural optic neuritis (ON) in patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). METHODS: We searched the French MOGAD database for adults with inaugural ON with a detailed report of acute treatment modalities and measures of high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at nadir and after 3 months. Predictors of visual outcomes were assessed by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Among 245 patients with at least one episode of ON, 82 fulfilled all criteria, and data on the peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) were available for 44. All patients received methylprednisolone (MP), combined with plasma exchange in 18. After 3 months, 75 of 82 (91%) patients retained full BCVA recovery, and median (range) pRNFL of the affected eye was 72 µm (40-102). Failure to regain 0.0 logarithmic minimum angle of resolution vision (Snellen 20/20) at 3 months was associated with time to first MP treatment ≥10 days (OR 16, 95% CI 1.14 to 213, p=0.01). pRNFL thickness after 3 months was related to better BCVA at nadir and time to first MP treatment <10 days (r2=19%, p=0.004 and r2=11%, p=0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Time to MP affects functional but also structural visual outcomes of ON in MOGAD.

A Narrative Review on Axonal Neuroprotection in Multiple Sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) resulting in demyelination and neurodegeneration. The therapeutic strategy is now largely based on reducing inflammation with immunosuppressive drugs. Unfortunately, when disease progression is observed, no drug offers neuroprotection apart from its anti-inflammatory effect. In this review, we explore current knowledge on the assessment of neurodegeneration in MS and look at putative targets that might prove useful in protecting the axon from degeneration. Among them, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-apoptotic and antioxidant agents, sex hormones, statins, channel blockers, growth factors, and molecules preventing glutamate excitotoxicity have already been studied. Some of them have reached phase III clinical trials and carry a great message of hope for our patients with MS.

Pure Relapsing Short Myelitis: Part of the Multiple Sclerosis Spectrum or New Entity?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pure relapsing short myelitis with clinical and paraclinical features suggesting multiple sclerosis (MS) has been described recently. Here, we evaluated the existence of this potential new form of MS by retrospectively searching for similar cases in the databases of the French tertiary MS centers. METHODS: Patients were included based on the present criteria: at least 2 short (<3 vertebral segments) myelitis episodes; minimum follow-up of 3 years; no MS-like brain lesion during all the follow-up; tested negative for both anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and anti-aquaporin 4 antibodies in serum; presence of oligoclonal bands in CSF; and comprehensive workup to exclude alternative diagnoses. RESULTS: Eighteen patients fulfilled all criteria. The sex ratio (females/males) was 5/1; the median (range) age at first relapse was 35.5 (25-54) years, the disease duration was 80.5 (50-308) months, and the annualized relapse rate was 0.36 (0.1-0.5). The median (range) number of relapses per patient was 2 (2-5), and the median (range) Expanded Disability Status Scale score at last follow-up was 1 (0-7.5). In CSF, the median (range) protein level was 0.34 g/L (0.18-0.77), and the median (range) number of mononuclear cells was 3 (0-28). Spinal cord MRI demonstrated a median (range) number of 2 (1-5) lesions per examination and 3 [1-7] on the last examination. Fifty-five percent of lesions involved the cervical levels. Secondary progressive evolution occurred in 3 of 18 (17%) patients. DISCUSSION: Pure spinal MS could be a rare entity in the MS disease spectrum. However, the existence of a distinct entity in the inflammatory CNS disorders cannot be excluded.

Anti-CD20 immunotherapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: 2-year real-world follow-up of 108 patients.

BACKGROUND: Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are recently introduced treatments in progressive MS and real-world data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe a cohort of progressive MS patients treated with ocrelizumab or rituximab in a real-world setting. METHODS: This monocentric prospective cohort study at the University Hospital of Strasbourg included patients with primary progressive or secondary progressive MS that started treatment with anti-CD20 antibodies before June 2019. Every six months, patients were assessed using the following standardized clinical evaluations: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). The primary analysis considered EDSS progression (of at least 1.0 if EDSS ≤ 5.5 and at least 0.5 if EDSS ≥ 6.0). RESULTS: We included 108 patients, with a median age upon inclusion of 53 years [48.0-58.0]. 72% were classified as primary progressive forms. Median baseline EDSS was 6.0 [4.0-6.5]. EDSS was significantly correlated with T25FW, SDMT and 9-HPT. Following 2 years of treatment, 38.9% of patients presented EDSS progression compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: Our large cohort confirms tolerance of these treatments in a real-world setting. Standardized clinical assessments could improve detection of deteriorating patients. Further studies are needed to establish predictive factors.

Rapid Discrimination of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder and Multiple Sclerosis Using Machine Learning on Infrared Spectra of Sera.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are both autoimmune inflammatory and demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. NMOSD is a highly disabling disease and rapid introduction of the appropriate treatment at the acute phase is crucial to prevent sequelae. Specific criteria were established in 2015 and provide keys to distinguish NMOSD and MS. One of the most reliable criteria for NMOSD diagnosis is detection in patient's serum of an antibody that attacks the water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP-4). Another target in NMOSD is myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), delineating a new spectrum of diseases called MOG-associated diseases. Lastly, patients with NMOSD can be negative for both AQP-4 and MOG antibodies. At disease onset, NMOSD symptoms are very similar to MS symptoms from a clinical and radiological perspective. Thus, at first episode, given the urgency of starting the anti-inflammatory treatment, there is an unmet need to differentiate NMOSD subtypes from MS. Here, we used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in combination with a machine learning algorithm with the aim of distinguishing the infrared signatures of sera of a first episode of NMOSD from those of a first episode of relapsing-remitting MS, as well as from those of healthy subjects and patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Our results showed that NMOSD patients were distinguished from MS patients and healthy subjects with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100%. We also discuss the distinction between the different NMOSD serostatuses. The coupling of infrared spectroscopy of sera to machine learning is a promising cost-effective, rapid and reliable differential diagnosis tool capable of helping to gain valuable time in patients' treatment.

Treatment regimens for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder attacks: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attacks require an urgent probabilistic anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategy. As inadequately treated attacks result in disability, there is a need to identify the optimal attack-treatment regimen. Our study aimed to identify predictors of outcome after a first attack in patients with an NMOSD presentation and propose the best treatment strategy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on the French national NMOSD registry (NOMADMUS), a nested cohort of the French multiple sclerosis observatory (OFSEP) recruiting patients with NMOSD presentations in France. We studied the first attack for any independent locations of clinical core characteristic of NMOSD, in treatment-naïve patients. The primary outcome was the evolution of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at 6 months, stratified in two ways to account for recovery (return to baseline EDSS score) and treatment response (classified as "good" if the EDSS score decreased by ≥ 1 point after a nadir EDSS score ≤ 3, or by ≥ 2 points after a nadir EDSS score > 3). We used ordinal logistic regression to infer statistical associations with the outcome. RESULTS: We included 211 attacks among 183 patients (104 with anti-AQP4 antibodies, 60 with anti-MOG antibodies, and 19 double seronegative). Attack treatment regimens comprised corticosteroids (n = 196), plasma exchanges (PE; n = 72) and intravenous immunoglobulins (n = 6). Complete recovery was reached in 40 attacks (19%) at 6 months. The treatment response was "good" in 134 attacks (63.5%). There was no improvement in EDSS score in 50 attacks (23.7%). MOG-antibody seropositivity and short delays to PE were significantly and independently associated with better recovery and treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: We identified two prognostic factors: serostatus (with better outcomes among MOG-Ab-positive patients) and the delay to PE. We, therefore, argue for a more aggressive anti-inflammatory management of the first attacks suggesting an NMOSD presentation, with the early combination of PE with corticosteroids.

Ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Exit strategy after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a crucial point because the risk of disease reactivation is high during this period. The objective of this observational study was to compare ocrelizumab to fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: All RRMS patients starting fingolimod or ocrelizumab within 6 weeks after natalizumab cessation were included. The primary endpoint was the annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 1 year. RESULTS: We included 54 patients receiving fingolimod and 48 patients receiving ocrelizumab after natalizumab cessation. In multivariate analysis, ARR at 1 year was significantly lower in the ocrelizumab group than in the fingolimod group (0.12 ± 0.39 versus 0.41 ± 0.71, p = 0.026), i.e. a 70.7% lower relapse rate. The cumulative probability of relapses at 1 year was 31.5% (17/54 patients) with fingolimod and 10.4% (5/48 patients) with ocrelizumab, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 3.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.1-11, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest ocrelizumab is potentially a better exit strategy than fingolimod after natalizumab cessation.

Interleukin-6 Receptor Blockade in Treatment-Refractory MOG-IgG-Associated Disease and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG-associated disease (MOGAD) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). METHODS: Annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale score, MRI, autoantibody titers, pain, and adverse events were retrospectively evaluated in 57 patients with MOGAD (n = 14), aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG seropositive (n = 36), and seronegative NMOSD (n = 7; 12%), switched to TCZ from previous immunotherapies, particularly rituximab. RESULTS: Patients received TCZ for 23.8 months (median; interquartile range 13.0-51.1 months), with an IV dose of 8.0 mg/kg (median; range 6-12 mg/kg) every 31.6 days (mean; range 26-44 days). For MOGAD, the median ARR decreased from 1.75 (range 0.5-5) to 0 (range 0-0.9; p = 0.0011) under TCZ. A similar effect was seen for AQP4-IgG+ (ARR reduction from 1.5 [range 0-5] to 0 [range 0-4.2]; p < 0.001) and for seronegative NMOSD (from 3.0 [range 1.0-3.0] to 0.2 [range 0-2.0]; p = 0.031). During TCZ, 60% of all patients were relapse free (79% for MOGAD, 56% for AQP4-IgG+, and 43% for seronegative NMOSD). Disability follow-up indicated stabilization. MRI inflammatory activity decreased in MOGAD (p = 0.04; for the brain) and in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD (p < 0.001; for the spinal cord). Chronic pain was unchanged. Regarding only patients treated with TCZ for at least 12 months (n = 44), ARR reductions were confirmed, including the subgroups of MOGAD (n = 11) and AQP4-IgG+ patients (n = 28). Similarly, in the group of patients treated with TCZ for at least 12 months, 59% of them were relapse free, with 73% for MOGAD, 57% for AQP4-IgG+, and 40% for patients with seronegative NMOSD. No severe or unexpected safety signals were observed. Add-on therapy showed no advantage compared with TCZ monotherapy. DISCUSSION: This study provides Class III evidence that long-term TCZ therapy is safe and reduces relapse probability in MOGAD and AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD.

COVID-19 exposure in SARS-CoV-2-seropositive hospital staff members during the first pandemic wave at Strasbourg University Hospital, France.

OBJECTIVES: Strasbourg University Hospital faced an important COVID-19 first wave from early March 2020. We performed a longitudinal prospective cohort study to describe clinical and virological data, exposure history to COVID-19, and adherence to strict hygiene standards during the first pandemic wave in 1497 workers undergoing a SARS-CoV-2 serological test at our hospital, with a follow up of serology result three months later. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1497 patients were enrolled from April 6 to May 7, 2020. Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 was measured, and COVID-19 exposure routes were analyzed according to SARS-CoV-2 serological status. RESULTS: A total of 515 patients (34.4%) were seropositive, mainly medical students (13.2%) and assistant nurses (12.0%). A history of COVID-19 exposure in a professional and/or private setting was mentioned by 83.1% of seropositive subjects (P<0.05; odds ratio [OR]: 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-3.4). COVID-19 exposure factors associated with seropositive status were non-professional exposure (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7), especially outside the immediate family circle (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-3.9) and contact with a COVID-19 patient (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.2). Among professionally exposed workers, systematic adherence to strict hygiene standards was well observed, except for the use of a surgical mask (P<0.05, OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.8). Of those who reported occasionally or never wearing a surgical mask, nurses (25.7%), assistant nurses (16.2%), and medical students (11.7%) were predominant. CONCLUSION: Infection of staff members during the first pandemic wave in our hospital occurred after both professional and private COVID-19 exposure, underlining the importance of continuous training in strict hygiene standards.

A meta-analysis comparing first-line immunosuppressants in neuromyelitis optica.

OBJECTIVE: As phase III trials have shown interest in innovative but expensive drugs in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), data are needed to clarify strategies in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica (NMO). This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of first-line strategies using rituximab (RTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or azathioprine (AZA), which are still widely used. METHODS: Studies identified by the systematic review of Huang et al. (2019) were selected if they considered at least two first-line immunosuppressants among RTX, MMF, and AZA. We updated this review. The Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials databases were queried between November 2018 and April 2020. To be included, the hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] for the time to first relapse after first-line immunosuppression had to be available, calculable, or provided by the authors. RESULTS: We gathered data from 919 NMO patients (232 RTX-, 294 MMF-, and 393 AZA-treated patients). The risk of first relapse after first-line immunosuppression was 1.55 [1.04, 2.31] (p = 0.03) for MMF compared with RTX, 1.42 [0.87, 2.30] (p = 0.16) for AZA compared with RTX, and 0.94 [0.58, 1.54] (p = 0.08) for MMF compared with AZA. INTERPRETATION: The findings suggest that RTX is more efficient than MMF as a first-line therapy. Even if the results of our meta-analysis cannot conclude that RTX has a better efficacy in delaying the first relapse than AZA, the observed effect difference between both treatments combined with the results of previous studies using as outcome the annualized relapse rate may be in favor of RTX.